[HOME PAGE] [OFFICES] [EMAIL] [CASE STUDIES]

ECI Logo ECI Logo

Protecting Our Global Environment

Case Studies
River Crossings


  St. Joseph River
Beach Haven, NJ
Salmon Cove NFLD South Bend, Indiana Florida/Indiana
130° Lateral Turn
Skidaway Island
Carman's River
 
River Crossing

River Crossings
Numerous river crossings have been performed to install utilities under environmentally sensitive waterways. This crossing under the St. Joseph's River features installing multiple conduit for communications utilities.



Feature Multiple Conduit Pullbacks in Drilling Extremes by Doug Allman


It was a record-setting month for Environmental Crossings, Inc. (ECI) of Traverse City, Michigan. July 1993 was the month ECI completed two monumental horizontal directionally drilled crossings. Deeper and longer directionally drilled crossings had been completed, but never before have multiple conduit formations been placed as on these two crossings.

These projects, the St. Joseph River crossing in Mishawaka, Indiana, and the crossing of the shipping channel at Port Canaveral, Florida had a number of similarities. Both involved crossing traffic ways and installing numerous critical communications circuits. Both also utilized conduit formations without external casing, using a method of placement developed by Douglas Allman.

The first job was the St. Joseph River crossing for Indiana Bell Telephone Company. Began in June 1993 the project specified a dozen 4 in. ID, high density polyethylene (HDPE) conduits to be placed on a 750 ft. crossing. The profile required an overall depth of 69 ft. and was drilled through blue shale bedrock.

A 36 in. hole would be opened through multiple pre-reams to ready the borehole for placement of the twelve conduits. During pullback of the ducts into the borehole, the drilling fluid would be replaced by a cement grout slurry for encasement of the conduits. Indiana Bell requested this encasement for external protection of the conduit formation.

Indiana Bell's conduit went through the SR331 bridge that was being removed to the water line by the State Highway Department for a new structure. The directionally drilled project would surpass the previous twelve duct crossing by 25% in length and would be the first multiple duct placement through a solid rock formation.

The profile of the crossing was precarious. After reaching the river's south edge, the drill bit would have to turn upwards in the rock formation and climb rapidly as it advanced. If this portion of the pilot hole were not on line, any difference would to be made up in 75 ft. of gravely soil with known building debris in the upper 15 ft. There was very limited chance for any correction.

Steering was done with computerized in-head guidance. Above-ground tracking was also provided to give reference to the position of the drill bit along its planned course. Despite severe magnetic interference, which impacted the accuracy of these systems personnel from CBC Welnav of Tustin, California, and ECI managed a near perfect exit.

After the pilot hole was drilled, the crew prepared for the pre-reaming process. Three different size reamers enlarged the pilot hole up to its final 36 diameter.

The HDPE pipe was furnished in twelve 10 ft. diameter reels, each of which yielded a continuous 850 ft. of 5 in. pipe that would provide a jointless and seamless conduit. These ducts were attached to a specialized pulling apparatus, and the drill rig then pulled them back through the borehole.

During pullback, a blended grout was pumped through the drill string in front of the duct formation. This process displaced the bentonite in the annulus of the soil, providing encasement of the 12 HDPE conduits.

A project of this magnitude would normally take months, creating significant disruption to the surrounding community. Even with unforeseen problems below ground near the exit location, this crossing was done in less than three weeks.

The Indiana Bell crossing was viewed by many, including other horizontal directional drilling firms, as unachievable as designed for bid. Indiana Bell's bid documents even revealed their cautious belief. Contracts stated specifically, that trenched conduit work for another part of the project could not be started until the river crossing was completed. In other words, if the river crossing failed, the other portions of the project would be useless.

The second of these two multiple conduit jobs took ECI and their equipment to Florida. There they had to cross the shipping channel at Port Canaveral. This crossing 1175 ft. in length and 101 ft. in deep would use seven 4 in. ID HDPE conduits placed in a 24 in. borehole drilled in the sandy soil.

Once again, these conduits would be encased in grout during the pullback.  Security of the communications circuits for the U.S. Air Force Command was the reason. The number of U.S. Air Force circuits was not specified (classified information), only that they were Cape Canaveral Command Control Links. Personnel with M-16 emphasized the importance of whatever number of circuits existed!

This project surpassed all previous multiple duct placements by 56% in length (425 ft.). While becoming the longest, it also became the deepest placement of this type of formation.

The Port Canaveral conditions of sandy clay with some shell fragments provided a much shorter interval to completing this crossing. Nine days were all that were required to drill the pilot hole. Made one pre-ream with a 24. fly cutter, and pulled the seven-duct formation into place. A grout slurry was again injected into the soil, to encase the annulus of the borehole around the conduits during pullback. Pullback lasted a total of two hours.

Coordination at Cape Canaveral became very interesting and complex. The Space Shuttle, Atlas, Titan, and Delta rocket programs are presently active at the cape.

Scheduling of all work activities were required around these flight periods. All personnel were required to obtain clearance and passes to enter the military base. Seventy-two hours prior to flight, restrictions classified as F3, F2, and F1 (three, two and one day prior to flight, respectively) began on construction operations. With each twenty-four hour period before launch, increasingly rigid restrictions on construction were implemented. Twenty-four hours prior to flight, F1 restrictions took effect and all digging ceased. A shovel was not permitted to enter the ground during the F1 interval. Such restrictions were to prevent any disturbance to below ground communications and control circuits.

The pilot hole was completed the morning of July 16. F1 restriction made it possible to be permitted to exit the surface, but no pit was allowed because the Space Shuttle was to lift off at 9:22 a.m., July 17. Clean-up and readying for the pre-ream was worked on through Saturday. Sunday was a day off since once again, F1 was imposed for an Atlas rocket launch on Monday at 6:09 p.m. Monday was spent readying the reels and special pulling apparatus.

On Tuesday July 20, the pre-ream completed. A pit for mud control was dug Monday evening, soon after the Atlas lifted off and Base Command authorized clearance to machine-dig. Wednesday was scheduled for pullback of the ducts. Once again,  ECI was under limited construction activities (F3) since the Shuttle launch from the previous Saturday was re-scheduled for the following Saturday. A waiver was granted and ECI was allowed to pull the duct into the borehole. The crossing was complete at 1:45 p.m.

Both these projects required innovative approaches. Completion of these types of crossings required more than a knowledge of one area. The integration of several systems, materials, applications, designs, and most importantly the customers' needs made these accomplishments stand out as more than records for Environmental Crossings, Inc. Not always is it the challenge of the task, but the vision that is brought to it.

    -     Multiple Conduit Pullbacks     -

WATER, SEWER, PETROLEUM, POWER, COMMUNICATIONS LINES
FIBER OPTIC BUNDLES, PNEUMATIC TRANSPORTATION TUBES
LICENSED HDD CONTRACTOR


Underground/Trenchless Technologies • Environmental Crossings

Questions or Comments? info@ecihdd.com


ECI Home   /   Fiber Optics /   /   Contact Us


Environmental Crossings Inc. ©2000 All Rights Reserved, S.I. MI 49686